View Issue Details
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0025228||mantisbt||documentation||public||2019-01-15 07:54||2019-01-17 09:32|
|Priority||normal||Severity||minor||Reproducibility||have not tried|
|Target Version||Fixed in Version|
|Summary||0025228: CVS integration not working anymore|
we have a customer who is working with mantis for over 10 years now. We are updating mantis from version 1.2.11 to 2.18.0 at the moment. Everything is working good so far, except the CVS integration which is not working anymore.
The documentation of mantis seems to be a little outdated:
The newest entries which I (and google) can find is https://mantisbt.org/blog/archives/mantisbt/8 and http://www.mantisbt.org/wiki/doku.php/mantisbt:faq :
Both links are dead.
There exists a new plugin for source integration https://github.com/mantisbt-plugins/source-integration which is supporting GIT, Subversion and Mercurial, but not CVS.
Is there any chance to integrate the commit messages from CVS to Mantis v2.x again?
|Tags||No tags attached.|
Built-in source code integration support has been removed starting from version 1.3.0., see https://mantisbt.org/blog/archives/mantisbt/440
The best way in long term would be to implement it as enhancement of the plugin.
While more thinking about it, I don't even know if extending the plugin is a good idea.
Thank you for your reply and the pointers how to proceed. I think you are right: It would be better to migrate to a newer version-control system. On the other hand it can be quite costly (or even impossible) to migrate legacy source code with a legacy development environment (running on a legacy system for legacy customers) to a state of the art environment...
Never the less: The blog entry mentioned before (first hit on google: https://www.google.de/search?q=mantisbt+cvs) has a date of July 2007, so everyone can see, that this is quite old.
The FAQ (last changed 2014) is another story. Wouldn't it be a good idea to update the FAQ or (at least) mark the complete FAQ as outdated?
For that reason I put that ticket to category "documentation"...
In this case I would keep Mantis 1.2.x, but update to latest 1.2.20 in case you are interested in having fixed at least some security related bugs.
Thank you for the updated FAQ, much better now.
May I point you to another outdated page: https://mantisbt.org/wiki/doku.php/mantisbt:features?s=cvs
Thanks for the pointer, but I think there is no need to start a list of outdated pages.
|2019-01-15 07:54||thennerich||New Issue|
|2019-01-15 08:25||atrol||Status||new => feedback|
|2019-01-15 08:25||atrol||Note Added: 0061242|
|2019-01-15 08:26||atrol||Note Edited: 0061242||View Revisions|
|2019-01-15 09:20||thennerich||Note Added: 0061243|
|2019-01-15 09:20||thennerich||Status||feedback => new|
|2019-01-15 09:47||atrol||Note Added: 0061244|
|2019-01-15 09:47||atrol||Status||new => confirmed|
|2019-01-15 09:48||atrol||Note Edited: 0061244||View Revisions|
|2019-01-15 09:52||atrol||Note Added: 0061245|
|2019-01-15 10:04||thennerich||Note Added: 0061246|
|2019-01-15 10:11||atrol||Note Added: 0061247|