You are right but this does not allow me to enforce a second person needed to resolve the ticket.
I need automatic feature (not by human check) to ensure that
The user (usually with developer rights) which has set the status from "assigned" to "fixed"
is a different one than the user which is ...
Search found 3 matches
- 21 Jun 2016, 12:36
- Forum: Help
- Topic: How can I enforce a two-man rule for closing issues
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10328
- 20 Jun 2016, 08:22
- Forum: Help
- Topic: How can I enforce a two-man rule for closing issues
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10328
Re: How can I enforce a two-man rule for closing issues
This would sadly not work, as the idea is that:
- A reporter opens a ticket.
- A developer fixes it.
- The manager assignes it to another developer or back to the reporter to test it
- The reporter or (second) developer) resolves it.
The important parts are that the person removing the bug is ...
- A reporter opens a ticket.
- A developer fixes it.
- The manager assignes it to another developer or back to the reporter to test it
- The reporter or (second) developer) resolves it.
The important parts are that the person removing the bug is ...
- 15 Jun 2016, 15:46
- Forum: Help
- Topic: How can I enforce a two-man rule for closing issues
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10328
How can I enforce a two-man rule for closing issues
The workflow used by the company enforces the following states afer assigned:
fixed => used after develpoer has fixed the issue in the code
to be tested => assigned to another developer/user to check if the fix has been succesful
resolved => assigned to the project manager after test
closed ...
fixed => used after develpoer has fixed the issue in the code
to be tested => assigned to another developer/user to check if the fix has been succesful
resolved => assigned to the project manager after test
closed ...