Page 1 of 1
status of configs being moved to db
Posted: 03 Mar 2005, 17:42
by br8kwall
On the mantis roadmap there is mention of moving the configuration options to the database.
We are anxiously waiting for this and I was wondering if/when it might be coming along? Will it really be included in the 1.0 release?
Posted: 03 Mar 2005, 18:12
by thraxisp
This is partially implemented now (in CVS). There is still work to do on the UI to change these parameters.
More questions...
Posted: 07 Mar 2005, 11:22
by mgerben
Hi,
Saw the attached PDF in number #4416 about the workflow.
Looks lovely.
Two issues/questions about this and the workflow in general:
- If I add or delete workflow-states, how will this screen be affected?
How is the workflow affected in general? For example, several actions seem to have certain status(ses) hardcoded to them.
- Will this screen use the translations? I noted that the management-screen which checks the workflow does not.
Re: More questions...
Posted: 07 Mar 2005, 13:22
by thraxisp
mgerben wrote:Two issues/questions about this and the workflow in general:
- If I add or delete workflow-states, how will this screen be affected?
How is the workflow affected in general? For example, several actions seem to have certain status(ses) hardcoded to them.
- Will this screen use the translations? I noted that the management-screen which checks the workflow does not.
The workflow screen works of the $g_status_enum_string, so any statuses defined show up in the workflow. AFAIK, there are no hardcoded statuses, except CLOSED. The top part of the screen defines the other variables that affect the workflow. (Note that defining the enums in a screen is difficult because of the translations).
The screens now use translations. I'm not sure that they have been synchronized yet.