User Tools

  • Logged in as: anonymous (anonymous)
  • Log Out

Site Tools


mantisbt:custom_field_display_requirements

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
mantisbt:custom_field_display_requirements [2007/08/07 14:28]
roleary
mantisbt:custom_field_display_requirements [2008/10/29 04:25] (current)
Line 38: Line 38:
  
 Not sure if this is correct, but in the MantisConnect API code, the new field that stores the display value as a serialized array returns it as such. So you'd get something like: "​a:​10:​{i:​10;​i:​2;​i:​20;​i:​1;​i:​30;​i:​2;​i:​40;​i:​2;​i:​50;​i:​1;​i:​60;​i:​1;​i:​70;​i:​2;​i:​71;​i:​2;​i:​72;​i:​0;​i:​73;​i:​0;​}"​ Not sure if this is correct, but in the MantisConnect API code, the new field that stores the display value as a serialized array returns it as such. So you'd get something like: "​a:​10:​{i:​10;​i:​2;​i:​20;​i:​1;​i:​30;​i:​2;​i:​40;​i:​2;​i:​50;​i:​1;​i:​60;​i:​1;​i:​70;​i:​2;​i:​71;​i:​2;​i:​72;​i:​0;​i:​73;​i:​0;​}"​
 +
  
  
Line 43: Line 44:
  
 thraxisp - What happened to the '​Advanced'​ setting? This controlled fields that were displayed on the Advanced pages. ​ thraxisp - What happened to the '​Advanced'​ setting? This controlled fields that were displayed on the Advanced pages. ​
-    ​roleary - The Advanced setting is still available (it's above the screenshot that I attached). However, I believe that "​paulr"​ has taken my patch and is modifying it, and that the Advanced setting is something he's changing. Part of this is because it obviously doesn'​t make sense to have a field '​Required'​ and '​Display only on Advanced'​. When he finishes his update, I'll change this page.+  * roleary - The Advanced setting is still available (it's above the screenshot that I attached). However, I believe that "​paulr"​ has taken my patch and is modifying it, and that the Advanced setting is something he's changing. Part of this is because it obviously doesn'​t make sense to have a field '​Required'​ and '​Display only on Advanced'​. When he finishes his update, I'll change this page. 
 +----
  
 thraxisp - I assume that the visibility by access level is retained. That is, viewer can't see fields with the read parameter set to a higher level. thraxisp - I assume that the visibility by access level is retained. That is, viewer can't see fields with the read parameter set to a higher level.
-    ​roleary - The visibility of fields is retained. Again, this could lead to a business rule issue where a field is not visible, but has been marked as '​Required'​. In that case, it actually wouldn'​t get checked because it wouldn'​t have been displayed... I think. This issue will probably also be resolved by paulr'​s changes.+  * roleary - The visibility of fields is retained. Again, this could lead to a business rule issue where a field is not visible, but has been marked as '​Required'​. In that case, it actually wouldn'​t get checked because it wouldn'​t have been displayed... I think. This issue will probably also be resolved by paulr'​s changes. 
 +----
  
  
 Please add your comments and feedback in this section. Please add your comments and feedback in this section.
mantisbt/custom_field_display_requirements.1186511321.txt.gz · Last modified: 2008/10/29 04:31 (external edit)