Workflow

Get help from other users here.

Moderators: Developer, Contributor

Post Reply
skibumm101
Posts: 40
Joined: 07 Jun 2006, 16:33

Workflow

Post by skibumm101 »

Did a quick search, and didnt find the exact answer im looking for. Here is my needs for workflow

After a dev resolves a bug, i need to assign it to a Tester who will then confirm that it is fixed and then close it.

I dont want it to go back into "assigned" status, becasue that is considered unresolved

Thanks
RB
atomoid
Posts: 108
Joined: 18 Aug 2005, 00:46
Location: santa cruz, ca

Post by atomoid »

generally, its easier to make it policy for QA to regress all "resolved" bugs, thats way you wont have to waste time noodling around.

you can define a public filter to display all status='resolved' bugs for reporter=[myself] and then the reporters can see all the bugs they need to regress, if the reporters arent the same people who regress and close the bug, then a more general 'resolved' filter should work.

if you need email notification for the 'assignee' who isnt the reporter or the developer, you can use the 'send a reminder' link which will add them to the email queue as a (sets them as a 'monitor' of the bug).
sirshurf
Posts: 19
Joined: 08 May 2007, 11:53

Post by sirshurf »

Interested Idea though...

There is a QA tool that ca integrate with Mantis... maybe we can integrate it the other way...
skibumm101
Posts: 40
Joined: 07 Jun 2006, 16:33

Post by skibumm101 »

any ideas on implementing this process flow.
Post Reply