Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- mantisbt:ui_grievances [2010/11/10 17:28] – created rombert
+++ mantisbt:ui_grievances [2013/04/23 17:42] (current) – Page rendering broken, added CR atrol
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+====== UI grievances ======
+This page collects various UI problems reported by users, to be taken as input for a MantisBT GUI redesign.
 [[http://twitter.com/AwesomePierre/status/2478876378791936|@AwesomePierre]]
@@ Line 4: / Line 9: @@
   - tablebased & hardcoded styles
   - rarely id or class attributes. no chance to css it
+[[http://twitter.com/irms/status/29462250797|@irms]]
+  - I can't setup my own view of issues. I *think* that's my biggest gripe.
+[[http://twitter.com/Sitebase/status/34209061209640960|@sitebase]]
+  - test it out for a day or two and you'll know why :). Adding new entries to mantis takes way too much time.
+  - ah ok, not that mantis is a bad product, I used it for over 2 years. It's just the interface is too slow and needs a new look.
+[[http://twitter.com/marionoack/status/34881790216773632|@marionoack]]
+  - #mantisbt is a good bug tracker, but he has an old layout, long development cycles and a complicated administration at file level.
+[[http://twitter.com/rtolga/status/36951121079570434|@rtolga]]
+  - Well, mantisbt is good enough, unless you need to ldap auth, sso, or use the soap api. Oh, you just can't re-style.
+[[https://twitter.com/#!/indizioweb/status/189148531775373312|@indizioweb]]
+  - The design is very "oldschool" and I think it's actually ugly, so no good feeling while working with it, you know?
+[[https://twitter.com/Cocoanetics/status/322317119012339713|@Cocoanetics]]
+  - Mantis customization only via config files, e.g. custom workflows
+  - little or clunky support for agile development.
+  - Jira has better overview of coming versions, better API, dated UI, file upload is better, Jira Connect.