mantisbt:ui_grievances
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| mantisbt:ui_grievances [2011/02/06 12:45] – @sitebase feedback rombert | mantisbt:ui_grievances [2013/04/23 17:42] (current) – Page rendering broken, added CR atrol | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| - test it out for a day or two and you'll know why :). Adding new entries to mantis takes way too much time. | - test it out for a day or two and you'll know why :). Adding new entries to mantis takes way too much time. | ||
| + | - ah ok, not that mantis is a bad product, I used it for over 2 years. It's just the interface is too slow and needs a new look. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[http:// | ||
| + | - #mantisbt is a good bug tracker, but he has an old layout, long development cycles and a complicated administration at file level. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[http:// | ||
| + | - Well, mantisbt is good enough, unless you need to ldap auth, sso, or use the soap api. Oh, you just can't re-style. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https:// | ||
| + | - The design is very " | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https:// | ||
| + | - Mantis customization only via config files, e.g. custom workflows | ||
| + | - little or clunky support for agile development. | ||
| + | - Jira has better overview of coming versions, better API, dated UI, file upload is better, Jira Connect. | ||
| + | |||
mantisbt/ui_grievances.1297014303.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)
