View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0010321mantisbtsignuppublic2009-05-19 19:26
Reporterdiathesis Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityhave not tried
Status acknowledgedResolutionopen 
Summary0010321: Real Name Validation Is Lame
Description

Mantis on caucho.com asked me to change my real name because it matched someone's username. That's ... well ... lame.

My real name is my real name. I don't care who has what user name, there's no reason on earth to suggest that I should change my real name. If you really insist that this is important, then 'real name' should be something else. 'Display name', maybe?

But being asked to change my real name to meet Mantis' rules is very irritating.

TagsNo tags attached.

Activities

thraxisp

thraxisp

2009-04-11 20:04

reporter   ~0021474

Last edited: 2009-04-11 20:16

Possibly a duplicate of 0010127.

See bug 0007144 for the rationale for the check. There is also a feature to allow duplicate real names.

Changing the label to "Display Name" does make sense.

giallu

giallu

2009-04-13 16:43

reporter   ~0021502

I think it's common sense that real names are not unique, sometimes you get fooled by this in real life but usually you quickly realize who is who.

IMHO, this is a (lame) limitation that should be removed from all (default) installations

thraxisp

thraxisp

2009-04-13 17:35

reporter   ~0021503

Please read the original bugs before making broad statements.

If I change my "real name" to giallu, then spam all over the tracker, who is to know it wasn't you???

diathesis

diathesis

2009-04-14 07:08

reporter   ~0021513

@thraxisp:
You don't remove that problem by making real names unique. If your "real name" variable is "Geoffrey Wiseman" and you spam all over this bug tracker, someone might well think it's me, because that is my real name. If you want a way to ensure that identity is clear, you'll have to do that through good profiles, email address verification and the like, same as every other web application.

IMO, anyway.

I'm not saying this isn't problematic, I'm just saying that the current solution makes things worse rather than better.

giallu

giallu

2009-04-14 10:44

reporter   ~0021522

I actually read those bug reports (I assume you refer to 0004198 and 0003975) and yet I fail to see how this is a good fix.

If there are places in the interface where ambiguity exists, we should add some disambiguation rule. For instance, I'd prefer showing "real name (username)" or "real name <email>" which are going to be unique.

Additionally, we probably don't need anymore the check because the user's name in each comment is hyperlinked to a user's info page. That page is now mostly empty, but it contains enough info to tell apart two users.