View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0010419mantisbtotherpublic2019-05-24 16:47
Reporterjonathh Assigned To 
PrioritylowSeverityfeatureReproducibilityalways
Status acknowledgedResolutionopen 
Summary0010419: Allow customized sorting of versions
Description

It would be useful if the Versions sort order could be customized.

Currently versions are sorted based on their release date.

Additional sorting options to be considered: version_compare(), alphanumeric sort

TagsNo tags attached.

Relationships

related to 0004750 new Add option to sort product version alphabetically 
has duplicate 0011095 closedjreese Version Number Definitions are sorted in a non-useful way. 
has duplicate 0014503 closeddregad Incorrect order of versions in dropdowns 
has duplicate 0015951 closedatrol Numeric releases are ordered incorrectly in Target Version menus 
related to 0025791 new sort target_version column (all version columns) by assigned date 

Activities

jreese

jreese

2009-04-27 09:01

reporter   ~0021693

If I remember correctly, version sorting is determined by the date/time associated with each version.

jonathh

jonathh

2009-04-27 09:27

reporter   ~0021696

Is it possible to change this? Even as a quick hack.. it is more useful to us to have it sorted alphabetically than by the date the release was created.

Thanks.

jreese

jreese

2009-04-27 09:34

reporter   ~0021697

Check core/version_api.php functions version_get_all_rows* and update the query to order by 'version' instead of 'date_order'. Note that this will likely affect ordering on the roadmap and changelog pages as well.

jonathh

jonathh

2009-07-29 05:53

reporter   ~0022596

Hi,

Sorry for the delay. I have just gotten around to testing the impact of this. I can confirm it does alter the Roadmap as well - this isn't a problem.

BUT this fix does not alter the order that versions appear in on the 'View Issues' page?

However, changing the same in 'version_get_all_rows_with_subs' does seem to have the desired result. Can you advise about this?

polzin

polzin

2010-06-24 08:04

reporter   ~0025974

@jonatth

However, changing the same in 'version_get_all_rows_with_subs' does seem to have the desired result. Can you advise about this?

Where did it not give the desired result?
A different sorting would be useful for me, too!

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2009-04-27 07:03 jonathh New Issue
2009-04-27 09:01 jreese Note Added: 0021693
2009-04-27 09:01 jreese Status new => feedback
2009-04-27 09:27 jonathh Note Added: 0021696
2009-04-27 09:34 jreese Note Added: 0021697
2009-07-29 05:53 jonathh Note Added: 0022596
2009-10-29 08:48 jreese Relationship added has duplicate 0011095
2010-06-24 08:04 polzin Note Added: 0025974
2012-07-26 16:23 dregad Relationship added has duplicate 0014503
2012-07-26 16:30 dregad Priority normal => low
2012-07-26 16:30 dregad Severity minor => feature
2012-07-26 16:30 dregad Status feedback => acknowledged
2012-07-26 16:30 dregad Summary Versions are not sorted => Allow customized sorting of versions
2012-07-26 16:30 dregad Description Updated View Revisions
2013-05-30 17:30 atrol Relationship added has duplicate 0015951
2015-08-01 14:55 atrol Relationship added related to 0004750
2019-05-24 16:47 atrol Relationship added related to 0025791