View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0016952mantisbtcustom fieldspublic2019-09-17 08:15
Reporterinfo4km Assigned To 
PriorityhighSeveritymajorReproducibilityalways
Status newResolutionopen 
Product Version1.2.15 
Summary0016952: When reporting issue receive error on custom field, but issue is still created
Description

I was doing a sample upgrade and the system did not like our checkbox configuration. When I reported an issue the red error appeared, "Invalid value for custom field xxxxx". I just assumed the creation of the issue failed.

So I guess there are two issues here:

  1. why is the checkbox configuration that worked in 1.1.x not accepted in 1.2.x? I converted it to radio buttons and it's fine.

  2. When I receive the error, why is the issue still being created? When I created the issue with the radio buttons and it went through without error, I noticed there were 5 issues in My View. See attached screen shot.

TagsNo tags attached.

Relationships

related to 0003759 confirmed Duplicate bug is created when resubmitting after file upload failure 
has duplicate 0003526 closeddregad Custom field regular expression doesn 
has duplicate 0016954 closeddregad Date type custom field with a default value set might result in application error on a new bug adding 

Activities

info4km

info4km

2014-02-11 10:27

reporter  

mantiserror.png (20,916 bytes)   
mantiserror.png (20,916 bytes)   
dregad

dregad

2014-02-11 11:51

developer   ~0039373

Please provide detailed, step-by-step instructions to reproduce the issue, including the exact custom field definition (before and after you changed it), also indicate if you have customized Mantis in any way and if so, how.

info4km

info4km

2014-02-11 15:45

reporter  

before_chkbox-1_1_7.png (60,168 bytes)   
before_chkbox-1_1_7.png (60,168 bytes)   
info4km

info4km

2014-02-11 15:46

reporter  

after_radiobutton-1_2_15.png (54,778 bytes)   
after_radiobutton-1_2_15.png (54,778 bytes)   
info4km

info4km

2014-02-11 15:54

reporter   ~0039377

Note on the Checkbox custom field:

OK, in 1.1.7 the field was defined as show in the attached "before_chk*png" file. I upgraded to mantis 1.2.15, so the field was actually the same. That was when the errors occurred as I mentioned, but the issue was created anyway. I didn't see anything in the documentation that explained changes to checkboxes.

I only got it to work with the radio buttons, which is the file "after*png".

In thinking about this - radio buttons actually make more sense because you may only select "yes" or "no", and not both at the same time. I did not originally set this up but it always worked. Maybe it shouldn't have.

With 1.1.7 the behavior of this field was as follows: if you check the box, "yes" is selected, otherwise unchecked box, sets it to "no".

My issue really is whether or not there is a bug with the upgrade. Theoretically as I mentioned, if you want only one individual selection, radio buttons are better anyway.

info4km

info4km

2014-02-11 15:56

reporter   ~0039378

Note on the fact that the issue was added when an error occurred:

My other issue which maybe should be separate from this one, is that although I got an error on a custom field definition, the issue was added/created/reported anyway.

dregad

dregad

2014-02-12 03:22

developer   ~0039380

Issue creation despite error sounds like the same issue as 0003759

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2014-02-11 10:27 info4km New Issue
2014-02-11 10:27 info4km File Added: mantiserror.png
2014-02-11 11:51 dregad Note Added: 0039373
2014-02-11 11:51 dregad Status new => feedback
2014-02-11 15:45 info4km File Added: before_chkbox-1_1_7.png
2014-02-11 15:46 info4km File Added: after_radiobutton-1_2_15.png
2014-02-11 15:54 info4km Note Added: 0039377
2014-02-11 15:54 info4km Status feedback => new
2014-02-11 15:56 info4km Note Added: 0039378
2014-02-12 03:22 dregad Note Added: 0039380
2014-02-12 03:22 dregad Relationship added related to 0003759
2017-08-19 21:40 cproensa Relationship added has duplicate 0003526
2019-09-17 08:15 dregad Relationship added has duplicate 0016954