View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002811 | mantisbt | bugtracker | public | 2002-12-26 12:41 | 2004-02-06 16:15 |
| Reporter | nepto | Assigned To | vboctor | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Platform | x86 | OS | Windows 2000 | ||
| Product Version | git trunk | ||||
| Summary | 0002811: Anonymous mode issues | ||||
| Description | Current implementation of anonymous mode contains several problems, that should be solved.
| ||||
| Additional Information | I welcome curent anonymous mode implementation. It is much better than no implementation in the latest stable release (0.17.5?). But anyway, it must be improved in several ways. It will be rather good, if Mantis will go way of open source tracker for supporting open source projects and anonymous submitting is one from the important things. I can help with fixes and implementation. Nepto, <a href="http://nepto.sk/">http://nepto.sk/</a> | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
Well, it seems that this report was forgotten even after Julian has assigned it. That's no problem, I know how busy people can became. I'm WILLING to solve all of these issue. I already did so in Dec/2002 and Jan/2003 (yeah, a year before), however my patches were not introduced and they became just archived in mailinglist (as other patches too). Just tell me, how you imagine anonymous users suppoer in Mantis, we can discuss and cosult the issue and finally implement it. I'm willing to do so, however I have no problem if someone other will make this. Just for imagination, you can look how we use Mantis on our Platon.SK website. Click on arbitrary project. |
|
|
Yes, sorry - I got fulltime work and haven't had much time to spend on mantis. I should really assign my bugs to someone else in the meantime... I don't even remember specifically how I was planning on implementing this, except that I thought it was going to be easier once we'd started using the auth_api. I think what we were moving towards was authenticating actions, rather than pages - that way if you wanted anonymous users to be able to perform certain actions (might be viewing a bug, reporting a bug, etc...) you would just have to include a check for that in that auth function. But your best bet at this point is probably to start a discussion on the developers mailing list and get some consensus there. I'll try to participate in the discussion. |
|
|
Can someone from the Mantis developers take care about this? |
|
|
Nepto, can you upload your patches to this issue. I checked out your website and I like your handling for anonymous logins. If I get this soon, then I will put it in 0.18.1. Thanks for your help, and sorry for the delay. |
|
|
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1469074&forum_id=3264 Please take a look also on the other patches from this month (December 2002), because almost all from them were skipped and ignored as well. |
|
|
Fixed in CVS and will be available in next release. Thanks Nepto and sorry for the delay. If you find issues with the latest code, please let me know. |
|