View Issue Details
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0003648||mantisbt||public||2004-03-10 09:56||2013-02-16 18:58|
|Summary||0003648: Set reply-to header for reminder mails|
When sending out a reminder mail, the reply-to address should be set to the mail address of the user who sent the reminder.
|Tags||No tags attached.|
It seems, that it conflicts with existing Mantis ideology - not to show email addresses to users.
oops, it seems, that Mantis shows email addresses to everyone, sadly...
Should possibly be a configurable option.
If you want all comunication to be made via mantis (central repository for info) then I don't think this is a good idea because you don't want people to reply to the email you want them to update the bug/add a bugnote.
But on the other hand if keeping all the communication within Mantis is not the goal one might find it desireable to do this.
We want all communication to be made in mantis. So if a reply to a mantis-mail ($g_from_email or $g_to_email I think), especially for state feedback, goes directly in a bugnote ...
I run Mantis on my personal server, and reminder messages have to go out with From: set to my personal EMail address, due to ISP's anti spam stuff. Not great, but I can live with that. But when people reply to these do-not-reply messages, I want them to go to a different, more proper EMail address.
So, I hope this issue will allow me to configure Mantis to add a Reply-To: header so replies will go to a different place than From:
We use mantis for task tracking and I have users who donâ€™t often directly log into mantis, when an issue is updated I would like the reply to address to be the E:Mail of the person who made the update, otherwise the users reply to the E:Mail just goes to a separate address that isnâ€™t checked as often, it should probably be a configurable thing tho.
We also need to set some sensible Reply-to: header for mails that go out of Mantis. Is there any chance, this gets implemented?
Resolving as duplicate of 0010371. Keeping the more recent bug as it has a proposed patch.
|2004-03-10 09:56||dors||New Issue|
|2004-03-10 10:52||yarick123||Note Added: 0005197|
|2004-03-10 11:05||yarick123||Note Added: 0005198|
|2004-03-12 01:09||mbegan||Note Added: 0005202|
|2004-03-12 02:19||sgrund||Note Added: 0005203|
|2004-11-04 18:34||lepton||Note Added: 0008251|
|2005-06-21 16:44||Lynk||Note Added: 0010596|
|2011-01-31 05:36||babicka_baba||Note Added: 0028118|
|2013-02-07 04:06||dregad||Note Added: 0035068|
|2013-02-07 04:06||dregad||Relationship added||duplicate of 0010371|
|2013-02-07 04:06||dregad||Status||new => resolved|
|2013-02-07 04:06||dregad||Resolution||open => duplicate|
|2013-02-07 04:06||dregad||Assigned To||=> dregad|
|2013-02-16 18:58||atrol||Status||resolved => closed|